TSLF Employment Blog

EEOC Settles Racial Discrimination Case Against Meat Processing Company

On October 7, 2021, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) settled its racial discrimination and retaliation lawsuit against Chicago Meat Authority, Inc. (CMA) for $1.1 million plus various forms of injunctive relief. What happened in this case and why is its settlement somewhat notable? 

EEOC v. Chicago Meat Authority, Inc.

In February 2018, the EEOC filed a lawsuit against CMA alleging years of various types of systemic racial discrimination. Some of the allegations included:

  • Subjecting African-American employees to race-based harassment, such as racial slurs.
  • Refusing to hire African-American applicants because of their race.
  • Taking affirmative steps to reduce the number of African-American job applicants, including advertising on Spanish-language radio stations and emphasizing job applicants who were referrals from existing employees.
  • Retaliating against African-American employees when they complained about racial discrimination at work.

The terms of the settlement are laid out in a consent decree, which is a type of settlement agreement. However, in addition to monetary damages, it contains injunctive relief that can later be enforced by the court, if necessary. Injunctive relief is a type of equitable relief that requires a person or organization to stop doing certain things or forces them to act in a particular way.

In the EEOC’s case against CMA, it’s the injunctive relief that’s most notable about the settlement. The injunctive relief requires CMA to:

  • Prioritize the hiring of African-American job applicants who were previously denied a job offer, but still want to work for CMA.
  • Make reasonable efforts to hire enough African-Americans so that its workforce is comprised of roughly 50% African-American workers.
  • Develop and implement anti-discrimination training programs for all employees, including management.
  • Create an internal policy to investigate discrimination claims.
  • Set up a hotline for job applicants and current employees to confidentially report racial discrimination.
  • Destroy all records showing that it fired former employee, Angelo Turner.

These terms go above and beyond what most victims of racial discrimination recover in a successful lawsuit against their employer. Even in cases where the EEOC is the plaintiff (where it’s more common to find injunctive relief), these are a lot of duties placed on CMA.

As for monetary relief, the consent decree calls for the creation of a $1.1 million settlement fund to pay for compensatory damages and back pay for all African-American job applicants since 2012 who were denied a job because of their race. The settlement fund also provides compensation to the four CMA employees who suffered racial harassment.

Summing It Up

In most employment law cases, it’s monetary damages that dominate the type of legal recovery. This is often the best remedy for many victims of workplace discrimination. But to prevent future cases of discrimination by a particular employer, it helps to have one or more forms of injunctive relief in place. Injunctive relief is also more likely when the EEOC brings the lawsuit on behalf of the employee.

Share this post

Latest Articles

Signs of Wrongful Termination: Was I Wrongly Terminated from a Job?

Signs of Wrongful Termination: Was I Wrongly Terminated from a Job?

Wrongful termination can be challenging to recognize, especially considering that Virginia is an at-will employment state. That means employers can fire employees at any point during their term with a company, without notice and without cause.  That does NOT mean, however, that all terminations are legal or above board. Whenever firings violate federal employment laws […]

A Look Back at the Biggest Employment-Related Stories of 2023

A Look Back at the Biggest Employment-Related Stories of 2023

2023 was quite the year in terms of notable events and 2024 is shaping up to be no different. Here are some of the biggest labor-related news stories from last year. Even if you didn’t hear about these events, there’s a good chance you’ll likely feel their effects, even if indirectly. Key Supreme Court Decisions […]

Understanding 5 Key Terms in Virginia Severance Agreements

Understanding 5 Key Terms in Virginia Severance Agreements

Understanding the complexities of Virginia severance agreements is crucial for anyone navigating a job transition. While many believe these agreements primarily benefit the departing employee, they also offer several protections to the employer. They can provide a financial cushion and ease the transition for employees while offering employers insurance against future disputes. However, these agreements […]

What Are My Privacy Rights as an Employee in Virginia?

What Are My Privacy Rights as an Employee in Virginia?

Maintaining the delicate balance between workplace monitoring and employee privacy rights is a critical issue in Virginia. Modern technology has expanded the scope of employer surveillance, making it crucial to understand the legal boundaries. Employees in Virginia should be aware of their rights concerning phone call monitoring, email surveillance, internet usage, video surveillance, and social […]

Schedule a Free Case Review

Talk To A Real Person

Play Video

Talk To A Real Person